Ad  RAD Intel

The Company Fixing Ads Isn't Public Yet – But Insiders Are Investing

You've seen them. The cringey, mistargeted, and downright WTF ads. You sit there wondering why brands are spending billions on content that just leaves you questioning your entire algorithmic existence after seeing it.

RAD Intel is teaching brands - with proprietary tech - how to read the room. Their AI helps brands understand why content works, who it actually resonates with, and what to say next. RAD analyzes real-time audience behavior and predicts what will convert, so brands can stop guessing and start making ads that actually land.

And it's already in serious demand. Fortune 1000 brands like Hasbro, Sweetgreen, Skechers, and MGM are using RAD Intel to level up their marketing - and getting up to 3.5x better results. With $37M+ raised and a valuation that's jumped from $5M to $85M*, it's a bit of a shock that RAD Intel is still pre-IPO. Shares are just $0.60, and investors from Meta, Google, Amazon, and Fidelity Ventures are already in.

So check them out now and get in on the action before then, lest you get stuck in the "I almost invested" cycle of regret.

👉 Click here to secure your shares


DISCLOSURE: This is a paid advertisement for RAD Intel's Reg A offering. Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.radintel.ai.

Alibaba to pay $433.5 million to settle shareholder lawsuit over monopoly claims

(Reuters) – China’s Alibaba said on Friday it had agreed to pay $433.5 million to settle a U.S. class-action lawsuit filed by investors alleging monopolistic practices by the e-commerce giant. Alibaba denied wrongdoing, saying it entered the settlement to avoid the cost and disruption of further litigation. The proposed settlement was filed in federal court in Manhattan and requires the approval of U.S. District Judge George Daniels. The lawsuit, filed in 2020, alleged that Alibaba claimed it did not violate anti-monopoly or unfair competition laws, despite requiring merchants to choose only one distribution platform.

The settlement covers investors in Alibaba’s American depositary shares from Nov. 13, 2019, to Dec. 23, 2020, and resolves claims they suffered losses when the market recognized Alibaba’s misleading statements and the stock price fell. Lawyers for the plaintiffs in court papers called the proposed deal “an exceptional result,” saying it vastly exceeded the median recovery in securities class actions where the investor losses exceeded $10 billion. The maximum damages award the Alibaba investors could have potentially sought had they continued litigating was $11.63 billion, the lawyers wrote. The case is in re Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 20-09568.

(Reporting by Surbhi Misra in Bengaluru and Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by William Mallard)